rien que le titre, ça ne rigole pas, ah les journalistes :clown:
on en sait un peu plus, info à vérifier
Rectification: c’etait pas un parapente mais un paramoteur. Et le pilote n’etait pas vraiment en tort:" The Board noted that the Airprox occurred in Class G airspace, for which see-and-avoid was the primary method of collision avoidance. Both aircraft were equally entitled to be in that location, and therefore the pilots shared equal responsibility for collision avoidance. Notwithstanding, the Board observed that the paramotor pilot had probably been unwise to position himself at 2000ft so close to the approach track for Southend’s active RW06, and at a location which would have been frequented by aircraft routing to Southend for IFR approaches. The gliding member concurred, and opined that the positioning of the paramotor possibly indicated a low-level of aviation awareness by its pilot.
Unfortunately, because the paramotor pilot could not be traced, the Board were unable to explore further this aspect. As an aside, the Board also noted that the fact that the pilot had not come forward himself (after what must have been a frightening event), was an additional indicator as to his likely inexperience in aviation matters."
http://www.atlantico.fr/atlantico-light/avion-ligne-evite-crash-en-frolant-parapente-983735.html
… :mdr:
